a mediocre dreamer

Everyone says Barack Obama is all talk and has no substance. I think he inspires. I don't know about you, but I'd rather have someone in office who motivates a country to change than one who tries to change it themselves. The latter has clearly shown to be a futile battle. As revolutionary and truly remarkable as this election has been - crossing the boundaries between race, gender, AND religion - I actually have neglected to follow it closely enough. I'm working on it. Nevertheless, here are my preliminary (and perhaps asinine to some) thoughts on the candidates:

Barack - I forget that events like these so deeply necessitate our prayers. It almost seems beyond our power to influence. But dear Lord, if this man's heart is as it seems, then help him to impart that onto the rest of us.
*see Daily Herald editorial below (bear it mind it IS an editorial)

Hillary - She dreams big, but what has she ever done?


The Republicans are beyond me:
McCain -

Huckabee -

Romney - A man's character is rooted in his faith and beliefs. If he considers them irrelevant to this campaign and his ability to lead a successful presidency, then I'm not sure I want such a person in office.

Giuliani - What he did for New York City during the aftermath of 9/11 was amazing, but it shouldn't be what carries him through the elections and into the White House.
*For president, Democrats: Barack Obama

Every long now and then, a transcendent figure arrives on the landscape of history.

That, in sharpest essence, is Sen. Barack Obama and his politics of hope in the campaign of 2008.

In the course of his fairly short political career, he has visited with our Editorial Board three times. Each time, after he's taken his leave, we've found ourselves struck by him, wondering at thoughts that, "This guy is extraordinary."

We're not a starry-eyed lot. We've chatted with presidents and statesmen and legends. We've often been impressed, but never been mesmerized. And then, Obama arrives and leaves us somewhat marveling.

He has that kind of effect on people. No doubt you've read about it elsewhere. You get a sense of it on television and at his rallies. But you don't really feel the full power of it until you're in a room with him.

Barack Obama is different.

In conversation, he comes across as engaging, sharp, unassuming, confident, visionary, positive and genuinely altruistic. Real.

The story of his life reinforces those impressions. While other college graduates were starting the climb up the salary ladder, he took a low-paying job in Chicago as a community organizer. When he became an attorney, he specialized in civil rights and helped successfully sue the state for failing to implement a federal voter-registration law. He also worked on the case of a whistle-blower who lost her job after exposing corruption in a research project.

The pundits label him as a liberal, and Republican opponents certainly will. Without question, his leanings are further left than ours.

But those are old-school labels, branded by old-school thought. Obama's approach is less about reflexive ideology than it is about a common-sense search for solutions. That's precisely what's refreshing about him.

Off-the-cuff the other day, he offered a kind comment about Republican ideas, and gosh, the knee-jerk firestorm it set off among politics-as-usual Democrats. It's time the country focuses on real issues, not artificial ones.

Sen. Hillary Clinton, who has served less time in elective office than Obama, has questioned his experience, but the record shows he has made an impact on real issues.

In the Illinois Senate, he passed legislation restricting the gifts politicians could accept from lobbyists and he also helped set up KidsCare, a program that provides health care to children in non-Medicaid families. In the U.S. Senate, he worked across the aisle with Sen. Richard Lugar to pass legislation intended to keep nuclear material out of the hands of terrorists and with Sen. Tom Coburn to improve oversight of federal spending after Hurricane Katrina.

Beyond that, we agree with speechwriter Theodore Sorensen, who told the New York Times, "The most important quality for a president, as Kennedy and Roosevelt demonstrated, is not how many roll call votes he answered sitting in the Senate, but his qualities as a leader who can mobilize people, inspire them, galvanize them, arouse them to action."

History will be on the ballot when Democratic primary voters go to the polls on Feb. 5. It will mark the first time a black and the first time a woman has a realistic chance to win the presidency. These are no small milestones. And Illinois takes special pride in both candidacies -- home to Obama, our junior senator, and birthplace to Clinton, a native of Park Ridge.

But the real history to be made is the course change Obama offers from the politics of division that has polarized us for so long.

Obama is different, and we endorse him.

He can galvanize the nation. He can bring us closer together. He can stem the cynicism of Washington and our political process. He can enlist the citizenry in community service. He can work with Republicans and independents as well as Democrats.

He can reduce the mood of fear. He can replace it with a mood of hope.

An interesting New York Times article on the world's perspective of the elections:

U.S. Race Captures World's Eye, and Holds It

By ALAN COWELL

DAVOS, Switzerland — To look at the reams of coverage in newspapers outside the United States or to follow the hours of television news broadcasts, you might conclude that foreigners had a vote in selecting an American presidential candidate — or, at least, deserved one, so great is America’s influence on their lives.

From Berlin to London to Jakarta, the destinies of Democratic and Republican contenders in Iowa or New Hampshire, or Nevada or South Carolina, have become news in a way that most political commentators cannot recall. It is as if outsiders are pining for change in America as much as some American presidential candidates are promising it.

The personalities of the Democratic contest in particular — the potential harbinger of America’s first African-American or female president — have fascinated outsiders as much as, if not more than, the candidates’ policies on Iraq, immigration or global finances.

And there is a palpable sense that, while democratic systems seem clunky and uninspiring to voters in many parts of the Western world, America offers a potential model for reinvigoration.

“It is in many ways an uplifting sight to see a great democracy functioning at that most basic of levels,” said Lord McNally, the leader of the small opposition Liberal Democrats in Britain’s House of Lords. “Even with all the money, the publicity, the power of television, the person who wants to be the most powerful man or woman in the world still has to get down and talk in small town halls and stop people on the street and stand on soapboxes.”

It was, perhaps, the first upset result in Iowa, with the triumph there of Barack Obama, that electrified interest, closely followed by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s victory in New Hampshire.

In Berlin, newspaper columnists started calling Mr. Obama the “new John F. Kennedy” — no small accolade in a city that reserves a special place for an American leader who, at the height of the cold war, told a divided populace that he, too, was a Berliner. “The black American has become a new Kennedy,” proclaimed the tabloid Bild.

Such was the exuberance that Karsten D. Voigt, the coordinator of German-American cooperation in the German Foreign Ministry, cautioned his compatriots against expecting too much. “No American president can live up to those expectations in terms of foreign policy,” he said.

In Paris, the fascination with the Clinton-Obama duel seemed to eclipse the Republican contest. “The Republican candidates are much less well known in France,” said Alain Frachon, the editor in chief of Le Monde. “It might be wishful thinking, but the French believe that this Republican era is over.”

Not only the French. Much of the fervid absorption in the primaries and caucuses — accessible as never before on 24-hour satellite and cable television channels like CNN and Fox News — seems inspired by a hope that the American electoral process will end an era of foreign policy dominance by neoconservatives.

“There is a desperate sense of need that there must be something better than Bush out there,” said Dean Godson, head of a conservative research group in London called Policy Exchange. Or, as Thomas Valasek, a spokesman for the Center for European Reform in London, put it: “The world at large has a massive stake in the outcome of the elections. Never before has the U.S. had such a terrible reputation, a terrible image.”

It is, perhaps, too early to guess what specific changes Europeans and other non-Americans expect from a new government. Many of America’s Asian trading partners worry about what they see as Democratic proclivities toward economic protectionism and stricter targets on greenhouse gas emissions.

But there are broader concerns. As Ramesh Thakur, a political science professor in India, wrote: “We foreigners can but pray that the new president, whoever he or she may be, will return America to its strengths, values and the tradition of exporting hope and other optimism. And so help to lift America and the world up, not tear one another down.”

In Japan, too, there are hopes for American renewal. “Already the fixed idea, ‘Only a white man can become president,’ has been broken,” the newspaper Mainichi Shimbun said Jan. 15. “We are witnessing the history, the process of grass-roots democracy turning into the U.S. strength.”

Israelis, for their part, seem to look at the elections through the narrower prism of their own security, and many seem to have concluded that Mrs. Clinton would be the best American president for Israel — a calculation bolstered by familiarity with her husband. By contrast, said Oz Katz, 29, an Israeli graduate student in public policy, Mr. Obama “is not really known to us.”

There is deep interest in the campaign in the West African nation of Senegal, fueled in large part by a dislike of President Bush and a hope that a new president will be more open to immigration and less hostile to Islam.

“I think President Bush is anti-Islamic,” said Mouhamed Souleymane Seydi, 24, a hotel-management student at the University of Dakar. “It’s become much harder for Muslims to immigrate to America or even to visit. If you show up at the airport with a beard and look Arab, you’re going to come under intense scrutiny.”

Closer to the United States, in Mexico for instance, attention is focused more on the attitudes of candidates toward immigration controls. “There is a whole nation of Mexicans living in the United States,” said Fausto Zapata, a former diplomat in Mexico City. “And the connections with relatives, friends and partners in Mexico are immense, almost gigantic. Almost any movement in the American economy affects Mexico, negatively or positively.”

Some outsiders maintain that, for a world seeking a signal of a changed direction in Washington, “the emblematic victory of Obama would immediately change the image of the United States in the world, particularly in developing countries,” as Jorge G. Castañeda, the writer and former Mexican foreign minister, put it.

But there is skepticism in some places that an African-American can actually win the presidency. “Can he win?” an Afro-Cuban cabdriver asked an American visitor in Havana. “I mean, can he win?” he asked, wondering if a black man could be elected in a land that Cubans are taught to see as riven with racism.

Curiosity about Mr. Obama is clearly behind the growing interest in the American vote in Brazil, where many citizens have African roots. Elsewhere in Latin America, expectations seem muted, particularly in Venezuela, where both supporters and foes of President Hugo Chávez seemed to look forward to the end of the Bush administration. “But we’re still aware that no candidate will drastically change relations between Venezuela and the United States,” said Manuel Sutherland, a representative of the pro-Chávez Bolivarian Association of Socialist Economists.

In Colombia, one of few places in the world that might have some nostalgia for the Bush era, many people seem drawn to Mr. Obama’s bid. “He would focus more on the needs of immigrants, making him the best candidate for Latinos,” said Ernesto Rubio, 39, a doctor in Bogotá.

In Asia, the level of interest generally seems lower, though people say they are watching. “People know the decisions of the American president will affect Indonesia, and that is why many are watching carefully the elections in the United States,” said Bonar Tidor, 45, a human rights activist in Indonesia.

But in the Philippines some displayed less concern, even with the Obama-Clinton race. “In the past we always have two white men talking about strange policies,” said Alex Magno, 53, a political science professor at the University of the Philippines. “But probably if they get elected it will be the same as the old white men who contested the elections before.”